Source 1
Effective Prompts for AI: The Essentials
MIT Sloan Teaching & Learning Technologies introduces prompting as 'programming with words' and highlights three practical principles: provide context, be specific, and build on the conversation.
Promptly Research Labs/Papers
This page collects the MIT and arXiv references used across the research experience. The annotations are intentionally short so you can scan for theory, prompting guidance, stability work, and optimisation methods quickly.
Source 1
MIT Sloan Teaching & Learning Technologies introduces prompting as 'programming with words' and highlights three practical principles: provide context, be specific, and build on the conversation.
Source 2
MIT Sloan's glossary gives concise definitions for prompt engineering, hallucinations, context windows, and related terms used throughout the Labs page.
Source 3
A broad survey that organizes prompt engineering into a shared taxonomy and vocabulary, making it useful for explaining prompt patterns, few-shot examples, retrieval grounding, and optimisation loops.
Source 4
Introduces Automatic Prompt Optimization, where natural-language critiques act like textual gradients to guide search over rewritten prompts.
Source 5
Measures instruction drift in multi-turn dialog and links part of the effect to attention decay, which is directly relevant when explaining why prompt structure can matter across long chats.
Source 6
A recent theory paper with a Harvard-affiliated author that frames prompts as inference-time configurations capable of shaping transformer computation.
Source 7
Presents Automatic Prompt Engineer (APE), which treats instruction search as a program-synthesis style optimisation problem over candidate prompts.
Source 8
Explores optimisation by prompting (OPRO), where an LLM iteratively proposes new candidates after seeing prior solutions and scores.